[IDEM libro. ] §48.22.16.prCum Ulpianus Damascenus ab imperatore petisset, ut matri deportatae ad uictum necessaria relinquere sibi permitteretur, item mater per libertum suum petisset, ut quaedam filio deportato relinquere liceret, imperator Antoninus ita iis rescripsit. 'Neque hereditas nec legatum nec fideicommissum contra consuetudinem legemque publicam huiusmodi personis relinqui potest neque earum condicionem mutari conuenit: quoniam autem pie rogastis, permitto uobis ultima uoluntate relinquere iis, quae ad uictum aliosque usus necessarios sufficiant, ut si quid ad eos ex his causis pertinebit, capere iis liceat'.
[THE SAME, from his Book [without title].] When Ulpianus Damascenus petitioned the emperor that he might be permitted to leave what was necessary for sustenance to his deported mother, and likewise the mother petitioned through her freedman that she might be allowed to leave certain things to her deported son, the Emperor Antoninus replied to them as follows: "Neither an inheritance, nor a legacy, nor a fideicommissum can be left to persons of this kind contrary to custom and public law, nor is it fitting for their status to be changed; but since you have petitioned out of filial affection, I permit you to leave to them by last will what may suffice for sustenance and other necessary uses, so that if anything shall accrue to them from these causes, they may be allowed to acquire it."