[PAULUS libro singulari de iudiciis publicis. ] §48.13.11.prSacrilegi capite puniuntur.
[PAULUS, On Public Prosecutions, Single Book.] Those guilty of sacrilege are punished with death.
§48.13.11.1Sunt autem sacrilegi, qui publica sacra compilauerunt.
However, those guilty of sacrilege are those who have plundered public sacred property.
at qui priuata sacra uel aediculas incustoditas temptauerunt, amplius quam fures, minus quam sacrilegi merentur.
But those who have targeted private sacred property or unguarded shrines deserve more than thieves, but less than those guilty of sacrilege.
quare quod sacrum quodue admissum in sacrilegii crimen cadat, diligenter considerandum est.
Therefore, we must carefully consider what sacred property, or what act committed, falls under the crime of sacrilege.
§48.13.11.2Labeo libro trigensimo octauo posteriorum peculatum definit pecuniae publicae aut sacrae furtum non ab eo factum, cuius periculo fuit, et ideo aedituum in his, quae ei tradita sunt, peculatum non admittere.
Labeo, in the thirty-eighth book of his Posteriora, defines embezzlement as the theft of public or sacred money committed by someone at whose risk it was not, and therefore says that a temple-keeper does not commit embezzlement in respect of those things which have been delivered to him.
§48.13.11.3Eodem capite inferius scribit non solum pecuniam publicam, sed etiam priuatam crimen peculatus facere, si quis quod fisco debetur simulans se fisci creditorem accepit, quamuis priuatam pecuniam abstulerit.
Further down in the same chapter, he writes that not only public money, but also private money can constitute the crime of embezzlement, if anyone, pretending to be a creditor of the treasury, has received what is owed to the treasury, even though he has taken away private money.
§48.13.11.4Is autem, qui pecuniam traiciendam suscepit uel quilibet alius, ad cuius periculum pecunia pertinet, peculatum non committit.
But a person who has undertaken to transport money, or anyone else to whose risk the money pertains, does not commit embezzlement.
§48.13.11.5Senatus iussit lege peculatus teneri eos, qui iniussu eius, qui ei rei praeerit, tabularum publicarum inspiciendarum describendarumque potestatem fecerint.
The senate ordered that those who, without the authorization of the person in charge of the matter, have provided the opportunity to inspect and copy public records, are liable under the law on embezzlement.
§48.13.11.6Eum, qui pecuniam publicam in usus aliquos retinuerit nec erogauerit, hac lege teneri Labeo libro trigensimo octauo posteriorum scripsit.
Labeo, in the thirty-eighth book of his Posteriora, wrote that a person who has retained public money for some use and has not disbursed it is liable under this law.
cum eo autem, qui, cum prouincia abiret, pecuniam, quae penes se esset, ad aerarium professus retinuerit, non esse residuae pecuniae actionem, quia eam priuatus fisco debeat, et ideo inter debitores eum ferri: eamque ab eo is, qui hoc imperio utitur, exigeret, id est pignus capiendo, corpus retinendo, multam dicendo.
But, with regard to a person who, on departing from his province, has retained the money in his possession after declaring it to the treasury, there is no action for remaining money, because he owes it to the treasury as a private debtor, and therefore he is registered among the debtors; and the person exercising this command (imperium) shall exact it from him, that is, by taking pledges, detaining his person, and imposing a fine.
sed eam quoque lex Iulia residuorum post annum residuam esse iussit.
However, the Lex Julia on remaining moneys ordered that this money also should become "remaining money" after a year.