[ULPIANUS libro trigensimo octauo ad edictum. ] §47.7.7.prFurtim caesae arbores uidentur, quae ignorante domino celandique eius causa caeduntur.
[ULPIANUS on the Edict, book 38] Trees are deemed to be cut down secretly which are cut down without the owner's knowledge and for the purpose of concealing it from him.
§47.7.7.1Nec esse hanc furti actionem scribit Pedius, cum et sine furto fieri possit, ut quis arbores furtim caedat.
And Pedius writes that this is not an action for theft, since it is possible for someone to cut down trees secretly even without theft occurring.
§47.7.7.2Si quis radicitus arborem euellerit uel exstirpauerit, hac actione non tenetur: neque enim uel caedit uel succidit uel subsecuit: Aquilia tamen tenetur, quasi ruperit.
If anyone tears up a tree by the roots or uproots it, he is not liable under this action; for he has neither cut, nor cut down, nor cut from below; he is, however, liable under the Lex Aquilia, as if he had damaged it.
§47.7.7.3Etiamsi non tota arbor caesa sit, recte tamen agetur quasi caesa.
Even if the whole tree has not been cut down, the action is nevertheless rightly brought as if it had been cut down.
§47.7.7.4Siue autem quis suis manibus, siue dum imperat seruo arbores cingi subsecari caedi, hac actione tenetur.
Moreover, whether someone does it with his own hands, or commands his slave to girdle, cut under, or cut down trees, he is liable under this action.
idem et si libero imperet.
The same applies if he commands a free person.
§47.7.7.5Quod si seruo suo non praeceperit dominus, sed ipse sua uoluntate id admiserit, Sabinus ait competere noxale, ut in ceteris maleficiis: quae sententia uera est.
But if the master did not command his slave, but the slave committed it of his own free will, Sabinus says that a noxal action is available, as in the case of other delicts; and this opinion is correct.
§47.7.7.6Haec actio etiamsi poenalis sit, perpetua est.
Although this action is penal, it is perpetual.
sed aduersus heredem non datur: heredi ceterisque successoribus dabitur.
However, it is not granted against an heir; it will, however, be granted to an heir and other successors.
§47.7.7.7Condemnatio autem eius duplum continet
Moreover, the condemnation in it comprises double the amount.