[IDEM libro octauo decimo ad edictum praetoris. ] §47.12.2.prSi sepulchrum quis diruit, cessat Aquilia: quod ui tamen aut clam agendum erit: et ita de statua de monumento euolsa Celsus scribit.
[The same, in the eighteenth book on the Edict of the Praetor.] If anyone demolishes a sepulchre, the Aquilian action does not apply; however, proceedings must be taken under the interdict "quod vi aut clam". And Celsus writes to this effect concerning a statue torn away from a monument.
idem quaerit, si neque adplumbata fuit neque adfixa, an pars monumenti effecta sit an uero maneat in bonis nostris: et Celsus scribit sic esse monumenti ut ossuaria et ideo quod ui aut clam interdicto locum fore.
The same writer asks, if it was neither soldered with lead nor otherwise fastened, whether it became part of the monument, or indeed remained among our property; and Celsus writes that it belongs to the monument just as bone-receptacles do, and therefore that there is room for the interdict "quod vi aut clam".