Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §47.11.9.pr

The Crime of Scopelismus in Arabia and Its Penalty

Passage 8056 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

Ulpianus discusses crimes punished according to provincial customs, detailing "scopelismus" in the province of Arabia, where stones are placed to threaten cultivators with death, and explaining its severe punishment.

[IDEM eodem libro. ] §47.11.9.prSunt quaedam, quae more prouinciarum coercitionem solent admittere: ut puta in prouincia Arabia σκοπελισμὸν crimen appellant, cuius rei admissum tale est: plerique inimicorum solent praedium inimici σκοπελίζειν, id est lapides ponere indicio futuros, quod, si quis eum agrum coluisset, malo leto periturus esset insidiis eorum, qui scopulos possuissent: quae res tantum timorem habet, ut nemo ad eum agrum accedere audeat crudelitatem timens eorum qui scopelismon fecerunt.
[THE SAME, from the same book.] There are certain matters which, according to the custom of the provinces, are accustomed to admit of punishment. As, for example, in the province of Arabia they call a crime "scopelismus", the commission of which is as follows: many of one's enemies are accustomed to "scopelise" the estate of an enemy, that is, to place stones which are to serve as an indication that, if anyone should cultivate that field, he would perish by a miserable death through the treachery of those who had placed the stones. This act causes such great fear that no one dares to approach that field, fearing the cruelty of those who committed the scopelismus.
hanc rem praesides exequi solent grauiter usque ad poenam capitis, quia et ipsa res mortem comminatur.
Governors are accustomed to prosecute this matter severely, even up to the death penalty, because the act itself threatens death.

Notes

  1. §47.11.9.prindicio futuros, quod... — futuros is a future active participle agreeing with lapides (masculine plural accusative). indicio is a dative of purpose ("to serve as an indication"). The quod clause is an appositive noun clause explaining the content of the indication, containing a conditional sentence in subjunctive representing a future-less-vivid condition in past sequence (the pluperfect subjunctive coluisset and the future periphrastic subjunctive periturus esset).
  2. §47.11.9.prmalo leto — Ablative of manner or means ("by a miserable death"), modifying the intransitive verb perire to specify the manner of death.
  3. §47.11.9.prinsidiis — Ablative of cause or means ("by the treachery/ambush"). Here it refers to the "plots/ambush" (insidiae) of those who placed the stones, indicating the cause of death.

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §47.11.9.pr. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:47.11.9.pr

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.