[POMPONIUS libro uicensimo septimo ad Sabinum. ] §46.4.15.prSi is qui Stichum promisit ita interroget: 'quod Stichum promisi, Stichum et Pamphilum habesne acceptos?', puto recte accepto latum et pro superuacuo Pamphili mentionem factam, quemadmodum si is qui decem promisit ita interroget: 'quod tibi decem promisi, uiginti habesne accepta?', etiam decem nomine erit liberatus.
[POMPONIUS, On Sabinus, Book XXVII.] If a person who promised Stichus should ask: 'Regarding what I promised, namely Stichus, do you hold Stichus and Pamphilus as received?', I think that the release has been properly given and that the mention of Pamphilus was made as superfluous, just as if one who promised ten should ask: 'Regarding what I promised you, namely ten, do you hold twenty as received?', he will be released indeed under the head of ten.