[IDEM libro quinto decimo responsorum. ] §46.3.101.prPaulus respondit non ideo eos, qui uirilem portionem ex causa fideicommissi inferre debuerant, liberatos uideri, quoniam quidam ex collegis per errorem plus debito intulerunt.
[THE SAME, in the fifteenth book of Opinions.] Paulus answered that those who were bound to pay their individual share on account of a trust are not on that account to be considered released, because some of their colleagues by mistake paid more than what was due.
§46.3.101.1Paulus respondit aliam causam esse debitoris soluentis, aliam creditoris pignus distrahentis: nam cum debitor soluit pecuniam, in potestate eius esse commemorare, in quam causam solueret: cum autem creditor pignus distraheret, licere ei pretium in acceptum referre etiam in eam quantitatem, quae natura tantum debebatur, et ideo deducto eo debitum peti posse.
Paulus answered that the case of a debtor paying is one thing, and that of a creditor selling a pledge is another; for when a debtor pays money, it is in his power to state on what account he is paying; but when a creditor sells a pledge, he is allowed to credit the price even toward that amount which was owed only naturally, and therefore, after that has been deducted, the debt can be sued for.