[IDEM libro quinto responsorum. ] §46.2.30.prPaulus respondit, si creditor a Sempronio nouandi animo stipulatus esset ita, ut a prima obligatione in uniuersum discederetur, rursum easdem res a posteriore debitore sine consensu prioris obligari non posse.
[THE SAME, Opinions, Book 5.] Paulus replied that if a creditor, with the intention of novation, had entered into a stipulation with Sempronius in such a way that there was a complete departure from the first obligation, the same things could not be pledged again by the subsequent debtor without the consent of the prior one.