[IDEM libro quinto decimo quaestionum. ] §46.1.56.prSi quis pro eo, qui libertus non esset et operas praestaturum se iurasset, fideiussor erit, non tenebitur.
[The same, in the fifteenth book of Questions.] If anyone becomes a surety for a person who is not a freedman and who has sworn that he will perform services, he will not be bound.
§46.1.56.1Item si filius a patre uel seruus a domino stipuletur, nec fideiussor acceptus tenetur, quia non potest pro eodem et eidem esse obligatus.
Likewise, if a son should stipulate from his father or a slave from his master, a surety who has been accepted is not bound either, because one cannot be bound for the same person and to the same person.
ex diuerso ergo patre a filio uel domino a seruo stipulato fideiussor acceptus tenetur.
Therefore, on the contrary, if a father should stipulate from his son or a master from his slave, a surety who has been accepted is bound.
§46.1.56.2Si nummos alienos quasi tuos mutuos dederis sine stipulatione, nec fideiussorem teneri Pomponius ait.
If you should give another person's coins as if they were yours as a loan without a stipulation, Pomponius says that the surety is not bound either.
quid ergo, si consumptis nummis nascatur condictio? puto fideiussorem obligatum fore: in omnem enim causam acceptus uidetur, quae ex ea numeratione nasci potest.
What then if, the coins having been consumed, a personal action for recovery (condictio) arises? I think that the surety will be bound; for he is deemed to have been accepted for every cause that can arise from that delivery of money.
§46.1.56.3Pro furti actione fideiussor accipi potest: item pro eo, qui in legem Aquiliam commisit.
A surety can be accepted for an action for theft; likewise for one who has committed an offense against the Aquilian law.
diuersa causa est popularium actionum.
The case of popular actions is different.