[IDEM libro tertio decimo responsorum. ] §46.1.41.prRespondit, si fideiussores in id accepti sunt, quod a curatore seruari non possit, et post impletam legitimam aetatem tam ab ipso curatore quam ab heredibus eius solidum seruari potuit et cessante eo, qui pupillus fuit, soluendo esse desierit: non temere utilem in fideiussores actionem competere.
[THE SAME, in the thirteenth book of Responses.] He answered that, if sureties were accepted for that which cannot be recovered from a curator, and after the age of majority has been reached, the whole amount could have been recovered both from the curator himself and from his heirs, but owing to the negligence of him who was the pupil, [the debtor] ceased to be solvent, an equitable action does not readily lie against the sureties.
§46.1.41.1Idem respondit, si in solidum condemnatus est unus ex mandatoribus, cum iudicati conueniri coeperit, posse eum desiderare, ut aduersus eos, qui idem mandauerunt, actiones sibi mandentur.
The same answered that, if one of several mandators has been condemned for the whole amount, when he begins to be sued on the judgment, he can request that the actions against those who gave the same mandate be assigned to him.