[IDEM libro septuagensimo septimo ad edictum. ] §46.1.33.prSi eum hominem, quem a Titio petieram, pro quo satis de lite acceperam, Titius liberum heredemque reliquerit: si quidem re uera ipsius fuit, dicendum est iudicium in eum transferri et, si non patiatur id fieri, committi stipulationem: si autem meus petitoris fuit neque iussu meo hereditatem adierit, fideiussores tenebuntur ob rem non defensam: si autem adierit me iubente, stipulatio euanescit.
[THE SAME in the seventy-seventh book on the Edict.] If Titius has left as free and as his heir that slave whom I had claimed from Titius, and for whom I had received security concerning the litigation: if indeed he really belonged to Titius himself, it must be said that the action is transferred to him, and, if he does not allow this to happen, the stipulation is forfeited; but if he belonged to me, the plaintiff, and has not entered upon the inheritance under my order, the sureties will be held liable on account of an undefended case; if, however, he has entered upon it by my order, the stipulation vanishes.
plane si meus fuerit et idcirco differam aditionem, ut, cum uicero, tunc eum iubeam adire et interim ob rem non defensam agere uelim, non committitur stipulatio, quia uir bonus non arbitraretur.
Clearly, if he belonged to me and I should postpone the entry for this reason, namely, that when I have won the case, I may then order him to enter upon it, and in the meantime I should wish to sue on account of an undefended case, the stipulation is not forfeited, because a man of integrity would not so decide.