[GAIUS libro secundo ad edictum praetoris urbani titulo de liberali causa. ] §43.16.10.prSi de fundo proprietarium et fructuarium praedo expulerit atque ob id fructuarius constituto tempore non usus perdiderit ius suum, nemo dubitat, quin dominus, siue experiatur cum fructuario aduersus praedonem siue non experiatur, retinere debeat reuersum ad se usum fructum et, quod fructuarius perdidit, id ad damnum eius pertineat, cuius facto periit.
[GAIUS, in the second book on the Edict of the Urban Praetor, under the title "On Status Trials".] If a plunderer ejects the owner and the usufructuary from a tract of land, and thereby the usufructuary loses his right by not using it within the established time, no one doubts that the owner, whether he brings an action against the plunderer together with the usufructuary or does not bring an action, ought to retain the usufruct returned to him, and that what the usufructuary lost should be charged to the loss of him by whose act it perished.