[PAULUS libro quinquagesimo octauo ad edictum. ] §42.5.6.prSi non expedierit pupillo hereditatem parentis retinere, praetor bona defuncti uenire permittit, ut quod superauerit pupillo restituatur.
[PAULUS, on the Edict, book 58] If it is not advantageous for a ward to retain his parent's inheritance, the praetor permits the goods of the deceased to be sold, so that what remains may be restored to the ward.
§42.5.6.1Si pupillus, antequam abstineret, aliquid gesserit, seruandum est, utique si bona fide gessit.
If a ward, before abstaining from the inheritance, has performed any transaction, it must be maintained, especially if he acted in good faith.
§42.5.6.2Quid ergo, si quibusdam creditoribus soluit, deinde bona uenierint? si quaeratur, an repetitio sit, ex causa id statuendum Iulianus ait, ne alterius aut neglegentia aut cupiditas huic, qui diligens fuit, noceat.
What then, if he paid certain creditors, and afterwards the goods were sold? If it is asked whether there is a right of recovery, Julian says that this must be decided according to the circumstances of the case, lest the negligence or greed of another should harm this person who was diligent.
quod si utroque instante tibi gratificatus tutor soluit, aequum esse aut prius eandem portionem mihi quaeri aut communicandum quod accepisti: et hoc Iulianus ait.
But if, while both creditors were pressing for payment, the tutor paid you by way of favoring you, Julian also says that it is equitable either that the same share be sought for me first, or that what you received be shared.
apparet autem loqui eum, si ex bonis paternis solutum sit.
It is clear, however, that he is speaking of a case where payment was made out of the paternal assets.
quid ergo, si aliunde pupillus soluerit? reddi ei debebit nec ne? et utrum a creditore an ex hereditate? Scaeuola noster ait, si aliquid sit in bonis, deducendum ex hereditate solidum exemplo eius, qui gessit negotia: sed si nihil sit in bonis, non esse iniquum aduersus creditorem dandam repetitionem quasi indebiti soluti.
What then, if the ward paid from another source? Will it have to be returned to him or not? And whether from the creditor or from the inheritance? Our friend Scaevola says that if there is anything in the assets, the entire sum should be deducted from the inheritance after the example of one who has managed business; but if there is nothing in the assets, it is not inequitable that a right of recovery be granted against the creditor as if for the payment of what was not due.