[IULIANUS libro quadragensimo quarto digestorum. ] §41.2.38.prQui absenti seruo scribit, ut in libertate moretur, non eam mentem habet, ut statim uelit serui possessionem dimittere, sed magis destinationem in id tempus conferre, quo seruus certior factus fuerit.
[JULIANUS, in the forty-fourth book of the Digests.] A person who writes to his absent slave that he may remain in freedom does not have the intention of wishing to immediately abandon possession of the slave, but rather of deferring his determination to that time when the slave shall have been informed.
§41.2.38.1Si quis possessionem fundi ita tradiderit, ut ita demum cedere ea dicat, si ipsius fundus esset, non uidetur possessio tradita, si fundus alienus sit.
If anyone has delivered possession of a tract of land in such a way as to say that he yields it only if the land were his own, possession is not deemed to have been delivered if the land is someone else's.
hoc amplius existimandum est possessiones sub condicione tradi posse, sicut res sub condicione traduntur neque aliter accipientis fiunt, quam condicio exstiterit.
Furthermore, it must be held that possessions can be delivered under a condition, just as things are delivered under a condition and do not otherwise become the property of the recipient than when the condition has been fulfilled.
§41.2.38.2Si is, qui Titio seruum uendiderat, heredi eius eum tradiderit, poterit heres rerum hereditariarum possessionem per eum adprehendere, quia non seruus iure hereditario, sed actio ex empto ad eum peruenit: nam et si ex stipulatu uel ex testamento seruus testatori debitus fuisset et heres eum accepisset, non prohiberetur rerum hereditariarum possessionem per eundem adquirere.
If he who had sold a slave to Titius delivers him to his heir, the heir will be able to acquire possession of the hereditary property through him, because not the slave by hereditary right, but the action on purchase passed to him: for even if the slave had been owed to the testator by stipulation or by will and the heir had received him, he would not be prevented from acquiring possession of the hereditary property through the same slave.