[IDEM libro nono decimo digestorum. ] §41.2.20.prSi quis rem, quam utendam dederat, uendiderit emptorique tradi iusserit nec ille tradiderit, alias uidebitur possessione dominum interuertisse, alias contra.
[THE SAME, in the nineteenth book of the Digests.] If someone has sold a thing which he had given to be used, and ordered it to be delivered to the buyer, but he has not delivered it, in some cases he will be deemed to have deprived the owner of possession, and in other cases the contrary.
nam nec tunc quidem semper dominus amittit possessionem, cum reposcenti ei commodatum non redditur: quid enim si alia quaepiam fuit iusta et rationabilis causa non reddendi, non utique ut possessionem eius interuerteret?
For the owner does not always lose possession even at that time when the lent thing is not returned to him upon his demanding it back; for what if there was some other just and reasonable cause for not returning it, and certainly not for the purpose of depriving him of his possession?