[SCAEUOLA libro sexto decimo quaestionum. ] §40.9.6.prIulianus de eo loquitur, qui in substantia nihil aliud habeat: nam si habeat, quare non dicetur unum posse manumitti? quia et uno mortuo soluendo est, et uno manumisso soluendo est, nec aduenticii casus computandi sint: alioquin et qui unum incertum ex seruis suis promisit, neminem manumittet.
[SCAEVOLA, from the sixteenth book of questions.] Iulianus is speaking of one who has nothing else in his estate: for if he has, why shall it not be said that one of them can be manumitted? Because even if one of them dies, he is solvent, and if one is manumitted, he is solvent, and accidental events are not to be taken into calculation: otherwise, even one who has promised an unspecified one of his slaves will manumit no one.