[IDEM libro sexto decimo ad Plautium. ] §40.9.18.prSi mortis tempore soluendo sit hereditas, si tamen cum aditur desierit esse soluendo, libertas a testatore in fraudem creditorum relicta non competet: nam sicut aucta hereditas prodest libertatibus, ita nocet deminuta.
[The same, from the sixteenth book on Plautius.] If at the time of death the inheritance is solvent, yet if when it is entered upon it has ceased to be solvent, the freedom left by the testator in fraud of creditors will not vest; for just as an increased inheritance benefits freedoms, so a diminished one harms them.
§40.9.18.1Si is, cui libertas relicta est, iussus sit heredi dare tantum, quanti est, et liber esse, uideamus, an adhuc fraus sit creditorum, quia heres mortis causa accepturus est, an uero, si alius pro eo uel ipse non de peculio det, nulla sit fraus.
If he to whom freedom has been left is ordered to give to the heir as much as he is worth, and to be free, let us see whether there is still a fraud on creditors, because the heir is to receive it on account of death, or whether indeed, if another pays for him or he himself pays not out of his peculium, there is no fraud.
sed si heres locuples non proficit ad libertatem, nec qui dat pecuniam prodesse potest.
But if a wealthy heir does not avail toward freedom, neither can he who gives the money be of benefit.