Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §40.5.32.pr-40.5.32.2
Securing Payment and Rights of Pursuit in Trust Freedom
Summary
Maecianus discusses that in trusts for manumission, the owner of a slave is not compelled to manumit before securing payment, and that while pursuit of manumission is generally denied if the slave is unwilling, both the owner and the slave have a right of pursuit when there is a special financial interest, such as a purchase price exceeding the actual value.
Notes
- 40.5.32.prnon erit manumittere compellendus — The omitted subject is the former owner of the slave (dominus) mentioned in the preceding text (31.4). It means that the owner shall not be compelled to manumit the slave himself first and then demand the price from the heir.
- 40.5.32.1et domino erit fideicommissi persecutio ... et serui — Here, the dative `domino` (dative of possession: 'the owner will have the right of pursuit') and the genitive `serui` ('that of the slave [will have]') are coordinated by `et ... et ...`. The genitive `serui` is used because, following the clause `cuius interest` ('in whose interest it is') which relates to `domino`, the same construction is understood for the slave (`serui interest`, 'it is in the interest of the slave') or as a possessive/subjective genitive with `persecutio`.
- 40.5.32.2persecutionem esse — An accusative with infinitive construction. It continues the indirect speech governed by the verb `intellegerentur` ('they would be understood [to...]') from the preceding clause, meaning '[it is understood] that there is a right of pursuit.'
Cite this passage
Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §40.5.32.pr-40.5.32.2. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:40.5.32.pr-40.5.32.2
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.