[IDEM libro nono decimo ad Sabinum. ] §40.4.7.prNeratius scribit eius, cui libertas sic data est 'si mihi nullus filius erit cum moriar, Stichus liber esto', impediri libertatem postumo nato.
[THE SAME in the nineteenth book on Sabinus.] Neratius writes that, in the case of a slave to whom freedom was given in this manner: 'If I have no son when I die, let Stichus be free,' his freedom is barred by the birth of a posthumous child.
sed dum speratur nasci, utrum in seruitute remanere dicimus an uero ex postfacto respondemus retro liberum fuisse nullo filio nato? quod magis arbitror probandum.
But while the child is expected to be born, do we say that he remains in slavery, or rather do we answer that, after the event, if no son has been born, he was free retrospectively? I think that the latter opinion is rather to be approved.