[POMPONIUS libro undecimo epistularum. ] §40.4.61.prScio quosdam efficere uolentes, ne serui sui umquam ad libertatem perueniant, hactenus scribere solitos: 'Stichus cum moretur, liber esto'. sed et Iulianus ait libertatem, quae in ultimum uitae tempus conferatur, nullius momenti esse, cum testator impediendae magis quam dandae libertatis gratia ita scripsisse intellegitur.
[SCAEVOLA in the twenty-fourth book of the Digests.] I know that certain persons, wishing to ensure that their slaves should never attain freedom, have been accustomed to write so far as this: "Let Stichus be free when he is dying." But Julian also says that freedom which is deferred to the last moment of life is of no effect, since the testator is understood to have written thus for the sake of preventing rather than granting freedom.
et ideo etiam si ita sit scriptum: 'Stichus si in Capitolium non ascenderit, liber esto', nullius momenti hoc esse, si apparet in ultimum uitae tempus conferri libertatem testatorem uoluisse, nec Mucianae cautioni locum esse.
And therefore, even if it is written: "Let Stichus be free if he does not ascend the Capitol," this is of no effect if it appears that the testator wished the freedom to be deferred to the last moment of life, and there is no room for the Mucian guarantee.
§40.4.61.1Et si ita in testamento scriptum fuerit 'Stichus, si Capuam ierit, liber esto', aliter liberum non esse, quam si Capuam ierit.
And if it is written in a will: "Let Stichus be free if he goes to Capua," he does not become free otherwise than if he goes to Capua.
§40.4.61.2Hoc amplius Octauenus aiebat, si quis in testamento sub qualibet condicione libertate seruo data ita scripsisset 'ante condicionem nolo eum ab herede liberum fieri', nihil ualere hanc adiectionem.
In addition to this, Octavenus used to say that if anyone, having given freedom to a slave under any condition whatsoever in his will, had written thus: "I do not wish him to be made free by the heir before the condition is fulfilled," this addition is of no validity.