[IDEM libro secundo ad Urseium Ferocem. ] §40.4.18.prQui duos heredes instituebat, post alterius mortem seruum liberum esse iusserat: is ex cuius morte libertas pendebat, uiuo testatore decesserat.
[THE SAME in the second book on Urseius Ferox.] A person who appointed two heirs had ordered that a slave should be free after the death of one of them; the one on whose death the freedom depended had died during the lifetime of the testator.
Sabinus respondit liberum futurum.
Sabinus replied that the slave would be free.
§40.4.18.1Haec condicio 'cum moriar, liber esto' uitae tempus complectitur et idcirco inutilis esse uidetur.
This condition 'When I die, let him be free' encompasses the moment of life, and therefore seems to be of no effect.
sed melius est uerba benignius interpretari, ut post mortem suam uideatur testator ei libertatem reliquisse.
But it is better to interpret the words more benignly, so that the testator is deemed to have bequeathed freedom to him after his own death.
§40.4.18.2Sed multo magis haec 'ad annum liber esto' uel ita accipi potest 'post annum, quam moriar, liber esto' et, licet hoc modo accipiatur 'post annum, quam hoc testamentum factum erit, liber esto', si euenerit, ut intra annum testator decedat, inutilis non erit.
But much more can this 'Let him be free in a year' be understood either as 'Let him be free a year after I die' and, even if it is understood in this way 'Let him be free a year after this testament is made', if it should happen that the testator dies within the year, it will not be of no effect.