[ULPIANUS libro quinquagensimo ad edictum. ] §40.4.12.prSi quis libertatem sub iurisiurandi condicione reliquerit, edicto praetoris locus non erit, ut iurisiurandi condicio remittatur, et merito: nam si quis remiserit condicionem libertatis, ipsam libertatem impedit, dum competere aliter non potest, quam si paritum fuerit condicioni.
[ULPIANUS in the fiftieth book on the edict.] If anyone leaves freedom under the condition of an oath, there will be no place for the praetor's edict so that the condition of the oath is remitted, and rightly so: for if anyone remits the condition of freedom, he hinders freedom itself, since it cannot otherwise apply than if the condition has been complied with.
§40.4.12.1Proinde et si legatum quis cum libertate acceperit, non aliter legatum habebit, nisi condicioni iurisiurandi paruerit.
Accordingly, even if someone has received a legacy along with freedom, he will not otherwise have the legacy unless he complies with the condition of the oath.
§40.4.12.2Sed si pure libertatem acceperit, legatum sub iurisiurandi condicione, putat Iulianus libro trigensimo primo digestorum remitti ei condicionem iurisiurandi.
But if he has received freedom unconditionally, and a legacy under the condition of an oath, Julianus thinks in the thirty-first book of the digests that the condition of the oath is remitted for him.
§40.4.12.3Idem puto dicendum et si libertati quoque iniecta condicio sit, sed testator eum uiuus manumiserit: nam et hic condicio legati remittetur.
I think the same must be said even if a condition was also imposed on the freedom, but the testator manumitted him while alive: for in this case too the condition of the legacy will be remitted.