[GAIUS libro primo de manumissionibus. ] §40.2.25.prSi tutoris habendi causa pupillus manumittat, probationi esse causam Fufidius ait, Nerua filius contra sentit, quod uerius est: namque perabsurdum est in eligendo tutore firmum uideri esse iudicium pupilli, cuius in omnibus rebus ut infirmum iudicium tutore auctore regitur.
[GAIUS, in the first book on manumissions.] If a ward should manumit for the purpose of having a tutor, Fufidius says that the reason is acceptable, but Nerva the son thinks the contrary, which is more correct; for it is extremely absurd that the judgment of a ward should seem firm in choosing a tutor, when in all matters his judgment, as being weak, is directed with the authorization of a tutor.