Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §40.14.6.pr

Preliminary Action and Burden of Proof on Freedman Status

Passage 6620 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

Ulpian outlines that whenever a dispute arises concerning a person's status as a freedman or their relation to a specific patron, a preliminary action (praeiudicium) is granted, and the party claiming to be the patron carries the burden of proof as the plaintiff.

[ULPIANUS libro trigensimo octauo ad edictum. ] §40.14.6.prQuotiens de hoc contenditur, an quis libertus sit, siue operae petantur siue obsequium desideretur siue etiam famosa actio intendatur siue in ius uocetur qui se patronum dicit siue nulla causa interueniat, redditur praeiudicium.
[ULPIAN, in the Thirty-eighth Book on the Edict.] Whenever there is a dispute as to whether someone is a freedman—whether services are claimed, or respect is demanded, or even an action involving infamy is brought, or he who calls himself the patron is summoned to court, or no specific cause intervenes—a preliminary action is granted.
sed et quotiens quis libertinum quidem se confitetur, libertum autem Gaii Seii se negat, idem praeiudicium datur.
But also, whenever someone indeed confesses that he is of freedman status, but denies that he is the freedman of Gaius Seius, the same preliminary action is granted.
redditur autem alterutro desiderante: sed actoris partibus semper qui se patronum dicit fungitur probareque libertum suum necesse habet aut, si non probet, uincitur.
Now, it is granted when either of the two desires it; however, he who says that he is the patron always performs the role of the plaintiff, and it is necessary for him to prove that the person is his freedman, or, if he does not prove it, he loses his case.

Notes

  1. §40.14.6.prsiue in ius uocetur qui se patronum dicit — The relative clause 'qui se patronum dicit' (he who calls himself the patron) serves as the subject of the passive verb 'uocetur'. The phrase 'in ius uocare' is a technical legal term meaning 'to summon to court'.
  2. §40.14.6.prlibertinum quidem se confitetur, libertum autem Gaii Seii se negat — This relies on the legal distinction between 'libertinus' and 'libertus'. 'Libertinus' refers to the general status of being a freedman, whereas 'libertus' designates the relation of a freedman to a specific former master (patron). The sentence describes a situation where one confesses to having freedman status but denies being the freedman of a specific individual, Gaius Seius.
  3. §40.14.6.practoris partibus semper qui se patronum dicit fungitur — The ablative phrase 'actoris partibus' functions as the object of the verb 'fungitur', which governs the ablative case. 'Partibus fungi' is an idiomatic expression meaning 'to play the role of'. Here, it indicates that the person claiming to be the patron always assumes the role of the plaintiff (actor) and thus bears the burden of proof.

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §40.14.6.pr. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:40.14.6.pr

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.