[ULPIANUS libro tertio decimo ad edictum. ] §4.8.7.prPedius libro nono et Pomponius libro trigensimo tertio scribunt parui referre, ingenuus quis an libertinus sit, integrae famae quis sit arbiter an ignominiosus.
[ULPIANUS in his thirteenth book on the Edict.] Pedius in his ninth book and Pomponius in his thirty-third book write that it matters little whether an arbiter is freeborn or a freedman, or whether he is of unimpaired reputation or infamous.
in seruum Labeo compromitti non posse libro undecimo scribit: et est uerum.
Labeo writes in his eleventh book that a submission to arbitration cannot be made to a slave: and this is true.
§4.8.7.1Unde Iulianus ait, si in Titium et seruum compromissum sit, nec Titium cogendum sententiam dicere, quia cum alio receperit: quamuis serui, inquit, arbiterium nullum sit.
Hence Julian says that if a submission to arbitration has been made to Titius and a slave, Titius also should not be compelled to render an award, because he accepted the undertaking together with another: although, he says, the decision of a slave is null.
quid tamen si dixerit sententiam Titius? poena non committitur, quia non, ut receperit, dixit sententiam.
What, however, if Titius has rendered an award? The penalty is not incurred, because he did not render his award as he had accepted the undertaking.