Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §4.8.2.pr

Effect of Arbitration Agreement and Claim for Penalty

Passage 823 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

Explains the principle that an agreement to arbitrate does not give rise to a plea in defense, but rather to a claim for the penalty.

[ULPIANUS libro quarto ad edictum. ] §4.8.2.prEx compromisso placet exceptionem non nasci, sed poenae petitionem.
[ULPIANUS in his fourth book on the Edict.] It is accepted that from an agreement to arbitrate no objection arises, but rather a claim for the penalty.

Notes

  1. §4.8.2.prplacet — Impersonal verb. Here meaning "it is accepted / held as a rule of law", governing the accusative and infinitive construction (A.c.I.) with exceptionem and petitionem as subjects.
  2. §4.8.2.prexceptionem non nasci, sed poenae petitionem — Accusative and infinitive (A.c.I.) construction. The infinitive nasci is understood after sed with poenae petitionem as its subject. This illustrates the Roman law principle that an agreement to arbitrate does not directly block a subsequent lawsuit via an objection (exceptio), but instead gives rise to a claim for the agreed penalty (poena).

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §4.8.2.pr. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:4.8.2.pr

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.