[IDEM libro quarto decimo quaestionum. ] §38.2.43.prIulianus putat patronum, qui Titio pro parte dimidia heredi instituto substitutus eo deliberante bonorum possessionem contra tabulas accepit, si postea Titius non adierit hereditatem, nihil ei, qui adit hereditatem, abstulisse, non magis quam si sub condicione fuisset institutus.
[THE SAME, in the fourteenth book of Questions.] Iulianus thinks that a patron—who, having been substituted for Titius, who was appointed heir to a half share, accepted possession of goods contrary to the will while the latter was deliberating—has taken nothing away from the one who accepts the inheritance if Titius afterwards does not enter upon the inheritance, no more than if he had been appointed under a condition.
igitur Titio deliberante res in incerto erit, utrumne semis ex substitutione in possessionem conuertatur an Titio adeunte singulis heredibus partes debitae auferantur.
Therefore, while Titius is deliberating, the matter will be in uncertainty, whether the half share from the substitution is converted into possession, or, upon Titius entering, the due shares are taken away from each heir.