Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §38.2.1.pr-38.2.1.2

Historical Development of the Praetorian Edict on Patrons

Passage 5937 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

Ulpian explains the historical context of the praetor's edict regulating the obligations of freedmen to their patrons, detailing the initial restrictions set by Rutilius and the subsequent measures adopted by later praetors regarding the possession of goods.

[ULPIANUS libro quadragensimo secundo ad edictum. ] §38.2.1.prHoc edictum a praetore propositum est honoris, quem liberti patronis habere debent, moderandi gratia.
[ULPIANUS libro quadragensimo secundo ad edictum.] This edict was proposed by the praetor for the purpose of regulating the respect which freedmen ought to show to their patrons.
namque ut Seruius scribit, antea soliti fuerunt a libertis durissimas res exigere, scilicet ad remunerandum tam grande beneficium, quod in libertos confertur, cum ex seruitute ad ciuitatem Romanam perducuntur.
For, as Servius writes, they were formerly accustomed to demand the harshest things from freedmen, namely to repay so great a benefit as is conferred upon freedmen when they are led from slavery to Roman citizenship.
§38.2.1.1Et quidem primus praetor Rutilius edixit se amplius non daturum patrono quam operarum et societatis actionem, uidelicet si hoc pepigisset, ut, nisi ei obsequium praestaret libertus, in societatem admitteretur patronus.
And indeed, the praetor Rutilius was the first to declare that he would not grant the patron anything more than an action for services and of partnership, provided, of course, that he had agreed to this, namely that if the freedman did not perform due respect to him, the patron should be admitted into partnership.
§38.2.1.2Posteriores praetores certae partis bonorum possessionem pollicebantur: uidelicet enim imago societatis induxit eiusdem partis praestationem, ut, quod uinus solebat societatis nomine praestare, id post mortem praestaret.
Later praetors promised the possession of a certain part of the goods; for indeed, the image of partnership introduced the performance of that same part, so that what he, while alive, used to perform in the name of partnership, he should perform after death.

Notes

  1. §38.2.1.prhonoris ... moderandi gratia — The genitive "honoris" serves as the object of the genitive gerundive "moderandi". The construction of a noun in the genitive followed by "gratia" expresses purpose.
  2. §38.2.1.prsoliti fuerunt — The subject is not explicitly expressed but is understood from the context to refer to the patrons (patroni) of the freedmen.
  3. §38.2.1.1se amplius non daturum — Indirect discourse. The accusative subject "se" refers back to the main subject, "praetor Rutilius". "daturum" stands for "daturum esse", with the omission of the auxiliary "esse".
  4. §38.2.1.2uinus — A scribal error or typo for "uiuus" (while alive), used here predicatively as a nominative singular adjective agreeing with the implied subject of "solebat". The translation follows this emendation.

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §38.2.1.pr-38.2.1.2. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:38.2.1.pr-38.2.1.2

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.