[IULIANUS libro uicensimo octauo digestorum. ] §38.13.1.prSeruo meo herede instituto dolo feci, ne testamentum mutaretur, eumque postea manumisi: quaesitum est, an actiones ei denegandae essent.
[JULIANUS, from the twenty-eighth book of the Digests.] When my slave had been instituted as heir, I acted with malice so that the will should not be changed, and afterwards I manumitted him; the question arose whether actions should be denied to him.
respondi: hic casus uerbis edicti non continetur.
I replied: this case is not contained within the words of the edict.
sed aequum est, si dominus dolo fecerit, ne testamentum mutaretur, quo seruus eius heres scriptus erat, quamuis manumissus adierit hereditatem, ei denegari, cum etiam emancipato filio denegetur, si pater dolo fecerit, ne testamentum mutaretur.
But it is equitable that, if a master has acted with malice so that the will in which his slave was designated as heir should not be changed, although the slave, having been manumitted, has entered upon the inheritance, actions should be denied to him, since they are denied even to an emancipated son, if his father acted with malice so that the will should not be changed.