[HERMOGENIANUS libro secundo iuris epitomarum. ] §38.1.48.prSicut patronus, ita etiam patroni filius et nepos et pronepos, qui libertae nuptiis consensit, operarum exactionem amittit: nam haec, cuius matrimonio consensit, in officio mariti esse debet.
[HERMOGENIAN, Epitomes of Law, Book II.] Just as the patron does, so also the patron's son, grandson, and great-grandson, who has consented to the marriage of a freedwoman, loses the right to demand services; for she, to whose marriage he has consented, ought to be occupied with her duties toward her husband.
§38.1.48.1Si autem nuptiae, quibus patronus consensit, nullas habeant uires, operas exigere patronus non prohibetur.
But if the marriage to which the patron consented has no validity, the patron is not prohibited from demanding services.
§38.1.48.2Patronae, item filiae et nepti et pronepti patroni, quae libertae nuptiis consensit, operarum exactio non denegatur, quia his nec ab ea quae nupta est indecore praestantur.
To a female patron, and likewise to the daughter, granddaughter, and great-granddaughter of a patron, who has consented to the marriage of a freedwoman, the demand for services is not denied, because services rendered to them by her who is married are not unseemly.