[PAULUS libro undecimo responsorum. ] §37.6.11.prPaulus respondit ea, quae post mortem patris filio reddi debuerunt, emancipatum filium, quamuis prius consecutus sit quam deberentur, fratri qui in potestate patris relictus est conferre non debere, cum post mortem patris non tam ex donatione, quam ex causa debiti ea possidere uideatur.
[PAULUS, from the eleventh book of Opinions.] Paulus answered that an emancipated son, even if he obtained them before they were due, does not have to contribute to his brother who was left under the power of the father those things which ought to have been returned to the son after the death of the father, since after the death of the father he is seen to possess them not so much from donation as from a cause of debt.