[IULIANUS Iulianus libro uicesimo tertio digestorum. ] §37.5.6.prSaluius Aristo Iuliano salutem.
[IULIANUS libro uicesimo tertio digestorum.] Salvius Aristo to Julian, greeting.
qui filium emancipatum habebat, praeterito eo patrem suum et extraneum heredem instituit et patri legatum dedit: filius contra tabulas bonorum possessionem petit: quaero, si aut uterque hereditatem adisset aut alter ex his aut neuter, an et quantum legatorum nomine patri debeatur.
A certain person who had an emancipated son, having passed him over, appointed his own father and a stranger as heirs, and gave a legacy to his father. The son sues for possession of goods contrary to the will. I ask whether and how much is owed to the father under the name of legacy, if either both have entered upon the inheritance, or one of them, or neither.
respondit: saepe animaduerti hanc partem edicti, qua emancipatus accepta contra tabulas bonorum possessione liberis et parentibus legata praestare iubetur, habere nonnullas reprehensiones: nam si dodrans legatus fuerit, plus habiturus est cui legatum erit quam emancipatus.
He replied: I have often noticed that this part of the Edict, by which an emancipated son, having received possession of goods contrary to the will, is ordered to pay legacies to children and parents, has some grounds for criticism; for if nine-twelfths (a dodrans) has been bequeathed, the person to whom the legacy is left will have more than the emancipated son.
decreto itaque ista temperari debebunt, ut et hereditatis partem emancipatus praestet ita, ne scriptus heres amplius habeat quam emancipatus, et legatorum modus temperaretur, ut nihil plus ex legatis ad aliquem perueniat, quam apud emancipatum bonorum possessionis nomine remansurum est.
Therefore, these matters must be tempered by a decree, so that the emancipated son may pay a portion of the inheritance in such a way that the written heir does not have more than the emancipated son, and the measure of the legacies should be tempered, so that nothing more comes to anyone from the legacies than what is to remain with the emancipated son under the name of possession of goods.