[ULPIANUS libro primo ad legem Iuliam et Papiam. ] §35.2.62.prIn lege Falcidia hoc esse seruandum Iulianus ait, ut, si duo rei promittendi fuerint uel duo rei stipulandi, si quidemsocii sint in ea re, diuidi inter eos debere obligationem, atque si singuli partem pecuniae stipulati essent uel promisissent: quod si societas inter eos nulla fuisset, in pendenti esse, in utrius bonis computari oporteat id quod debetur uel ex cuius bonis detrahi.
[ULPIANUS, in the first book on the Lex Iulia et Papia.] Iulianus says that in the Lex Falcidia this must be observed, namely, that if there are two joint debtors or two joint creditors, if indeed they are partners in that matter, the obligation ought to be divided between them, just as if each individual had stipulated for or promised a part of the money; but if there was no partnership between them, it remains pending in whose assets that which is owed should be computed, or from whose assets it should be deducted.
§35.2.62.1Corpora si qua sunt in bonis defuncti, secundum rei ueritatem aestimanda erunt, hoc est secundum praesens pretium: nec quicquam eorum formali pretio aestimandum esse sciendum est.
If there are any corporeal objects among the assets of the deceased, they must be valued according to the truth of the matter, that is, according to their current price; and it must be known that none of them is to be valued at a nominal price.