[IAUOLENUS libro quarto decimo ex Cassio. ] §35.2.60.prCum pater impuberi filiae heredem substituit, id quod ei legatorum nomine a patre obuenit, cum hereditas ad substiitutos pertinet, in computationem legis Falcidiae non uenit.
[JAVOLENUS, in the fourteenth book on Cassius.] When a father has substituted an heir for his daughter who is under puberty, that which accrued to her from her father under the name of legacies does not enter into the calculation of the Lex Falcidia when the inheritance goes to the substituted heirs.
§35.2.60.1Legato petito cum in litem iuratum est, ratio legis Falcidiae non eius summae, in quam legatarius iurauit, haberi debet, sed eius, quanti re uera id fuit quod petitum est: nam id quod poenae causa adcreuit in legem Falcidiam non incidit.
When a legacy is claimed and an oath has been taken in court, the calculation of the Lex Falcidia ought to be made, not of that sum which the legatee swore to, but of that which the thing claimed was actually worth; for that which has accrued by way of penalty does not fall under the Lex Falcidia.