[IDEM libro sexto responsorum. ] §35.2.27.pr'Seius et Agerius si intra diem trigesimum mortis meae rei publicae nostrae cauerint contentos se futuros tot aureis legis Falcidiae beneficio omisso, heredes mihi sunto.
[THE SAME, in his sixth book of Responses.] 'If Seius and Agerius, within thirty days of my death, shall give security to our municipality that they will be content with so many aurei, waiving the benefit of the Falcidian law, let them be my heirs.
quos inuicem substituo.
Whom I substitute for each other.
quod si uoluntati meae non consenserint, exheredes sunto'. quaesitum est, an heredes instituti hereditatem adire possint, si condicioni parere nolunt, cum habeant substitutos eadem condicione praescripta.
But if they do not agree to my will, let them be disinherited.' The question arose whether the appointed heirs can enter upon the inheritance if they do not wish to comply with the condition, since they have substitutes appointed under the same prescribed condition.
respondit Seium et Agerium primo loco institutos perinde adire posse, ac si ea condicio, quae fraudis causa adscripta est, adscripta non esset.
He replied that Seius and Agerius, appointed in the first place, can enter upon the inheritance just as if that condition, which was added for the purpose of evading the law, had not been added.