[IDEM libro septimo responsorum. ] §35.1.77.prAuia, quae nepotem sub condicione emancipationis pro parte heredem instituerat, ita postea codicillis scribsit: 'hoc amplius nepoti meo, quam quod eum heredem institui, lego praedia illa'.
[THE SAME in the seventh book of Responses.] A grandmother, who had appointed her grandson as heir to a share under the condition of emancipation, subsequently wrote in her codicils as follows: 'In addition to my having appointed him heir, I bequeath those estates to my grandson.' It is held that the condition of emancipation is deemed to be repeated, even though the grandmother had made no substitution in the legacies as she had done in the inheritance.
condicionem emancipationis repetitam uideri placet, quamuis auia nullam in legatis, ut in hereditate, substitutionem fecisset. nam et cum seruus pure quidem liber, heres autem sub condicione scriptus et, si heres non exstiterit, legatum accipere iussus est, in legato repetitam uideri libertatem diuus Pius rescribsit.
For the divine Pius also rescribed that when a slave is indeed appointed free unconditionally, but is appointed heir under a condition, and, if he does not become heir, is ordered to receive a legacy, the freedom is deemed to be repeated in the legacy.
§35.1.77.1Muciana cautio locum non habet, si per aliam condicionem actio legati differri possit.
The Mucian caution has no place if the action for the legacy can be deferred by another condition.
§35.1.77.2'Titio, si mulier non nubserit, heres centum dato': quam pecuniam eidem mulieri Titius restituere rogatus est.
'Let the heir give one hundred to Titius, if the woman does not marry'; Titius was requested to restore this money to the same woman.
si nubserit mulier die legati cedente, fideicommissum petet: remoto autem fideicommisso legatarius exemplum Mucianae cautionis non habebit.
If the woman marries when the right to the legacy vests, she will claim the fideicommissum; but if the fideicommissum is set aside, the legatee will not have the benefit of the Mucian caution.
§35.1.77.3Pater exheredatae filiae tutores dedit eosque, si mater eius, impubere filia constituta, uita decessisset, ad rem gerendam accedere iussit, cum uxori mandatum esset, ut moriens filiae communi decies restitueret.
A father appointed tutors for his disinherited daughter and ordered them, if her mother should die while the daughter was still underage, to enter upon the administration, while the wife (mother) had been requested to restore ten hundred thousand sesterces to their common daughter at her death.
non sub condicione tutores uidebuntur dati nec, si quid aliud interea puella quaesisset, eius administratione prohiberi, cautio uero fideicommissi matri remissa.
The tutors will not be deemed appointed under a condition, nor, if the girl should have acquired anything else in the meantime, are they prohibited from its administration; but the caution for the fideicommissum is deemed remitted to the mother.
quocumque indicio uoluntatis cautio legatorum uel fideicommissorum remitti potest.
By any indication of intent, the caution for legacies or fideicommissa can be remitted.
itaque si cautionis non petendae condicio legato uel fideicommisso praescribatur, condicionem ea res non faciet: non enim deficiet, si quis caueri desiderauerit, onere cautionis non secuto, quod aduersus inuitum hodie iure publico sequi non potest, postquam remitti posse cautionem placuit.
Therefore, if a condition of not demanding a caution is prescribed for a legacy or fideicommissum, this circumstance will not create a condition; for it will not fail if anyone should desire caution to be given, even if the burden of caution does not follow, which today by public law cannot be enforced against an unwilling person, after it was decided that caution can be remitted.