[IDEM libro nono responsorum. ] §34.4.25.prAlteri ex heredibus praeceptionem praedii dedit: mox alteri praestari aduersus debitorem actiones ad eum finem mandauit, quo praedium fuerat comparatum.
[THE SAME in the ninth book of Responses.] He gave a pre-legacy of an estate to one of his heirs; soon afterwards, he directed that actions against a debtor be assigned to the other heir for the purpose for which the estate had been purchased.
cum postea praedio distracto citra ullam offensam eius, qui praeceptionem acceperat, pretium in corpus patrimonii redisset, non esse praestandas actiones coheredi respondi.
Since, after the estate had subsequently been sold without any offense to the one who had received the pre-legacy, the price had returned to the body of the patrimony, I responded that the actions ought not to be assigned to the co-heir.