Humanitext Reader

Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §34.2.2.pr

Purchase of Ornaments After Death or Divorce and Legacy Validity

Passage 5161 of 9271 · Latin

Summary

This section discusses the validity of a legacy and the obligation of delivery concerning ornaments commissioned for a wife, when the purchase was made after the testator's death, or after the wife's death or divorce.

[AFRICANUS libro secundo quaestionum. ] §34.2.2.prQui tibi mandauerat, ut ornamenta in usum uxoris suae emeres, eidem uxori uti adsolet legauit quae eius causa parata erunt: tu deinde post mortem mandatoris ignorans eum decessisse emisti.
[AFRICANUS, in the second book of Questions.] A person who had commissioned you to buy ornaments for the use of his wife bequeathed to the same wife, as is customary, what should be provided for her sake. You then, after the death of the mandator, not knowing that he had deceased, bought them.
non debebuntur mulieri, quoniam ea uerba ad mortis tempus referuntur.
They will not be owed to the woman, since those words refer to the time of death.
at si uiuente testatore, muliere autem mortua emeris, non ineleganter dicetur inefficax hoc legatum esse, quando non possit uere dici eius causa paratum uideri, quae prius decessit.
But if, while the testator was living but the woman was dead, you bought them, it will not be inelegantly said that this legacy is ineffective, since it cannot truly be said to seem to have been provided for the sake of her who died before.
eadem dicenda erunt et si uiuat quidem mulier, sed diuerterit et quaeratur, an post empta ei debeantur, quasi non uideantur uxoris causa parata.
The same things must be said also if the woman indeed lives but has divorced, and the question is asked whether things bought afterwards are owed to her, as if they do not seem to have been provided for the sake of a wife.

Notes

  1. §34.2.2.pruti adsolet — A parenthetical expression meaning "as is customary [for wills of this kind]", modifying the main verb of bequeathing (legauit).
  2. §34.2.2.prnon ineleganter dicetur — A double negation (litotes), literally "it will not be said inelegantly," which serves as a positive approval, indicating that the legal reasoning presented (the invalidity of the legacy in this case) is highly clear and appropriate.
  3. §34.2.2.prpost empta — The adverb post modifies the neuter plural perfect participle empta used substantively, referring to "things bought after [the event of divorce]."

Cite this passage

Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §34.2.2.pr. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:34.2.2.pr

Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.

Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.