[IAUOLENUS libro tertio ex posterioribus Labeonis. ] §33.10.10.prQui uestem omnem et res plurium generum supellectilis expenso ferre solitus erat, is uxori supellectilem legauerat.
[JAVOLENUS in his third book of Epitomes of Labeo's Posterity.] A man who was accustomed to enter all his clothing and items of several kinds of household goods in his account book as expenditure had bequeathed household goods to his wife.
recte negabant uestem legato cessuram Labeo Ofilius Cascellius, quia non posset uideri uestis appellatione supellectilis contineri.
Labeo, Ofilius, and Cascellius rightly denied that the clothing would go to the legacy, because it could not seem that clothing is contained under the designation of household goods.