[IAUOLENUS libro secundo ex posterioribus Labeonis. ] §32.0.100.pr'Heres meus damnas esto Lucio Titio Stichum seruum meum reddere' uel ita: 'illum seruum meum illi reddito'. Cascellius ait deberi neque id Labeo improbat, quia qui reddere iubetur, simul et dare iubetur.
[IAVOLENUS, from his second book of Epitomes of Labeo's Posteriores.] 'My heir shall be under obligation to deliver my slave Stichus to Lucius Titius' or thus: 'deliver that slave of mine to him.' Cascellius says that they are owed, and Labeo does not disapprove of this, because he who is ordered to deliver (reddere) is at the same time ordered to give (dare).
§32.0.100.1Duae statuae marmoreae cuidam nominatim, item omne marmor erat legatum: nullam statuam marmoream praeter duas Cascellius putat deberi: Ofilius Trebatius contra.
Two marble statues were bequeathed to someone by name, and likewise all the marble [to someone else]: Cascellius thinks that no marble statue besides the two is owed; Ofilius and Trebatius think the contrary.
Labeo Cascellii sententiam probat, quod uerum puto, quia duas statuas legando potest uideri non putasse in marmore se statuas legare.
Labeo approves of Cascellius' opinion, which I think is correct, because by bequeathing the two statues by name, the testator can be seen to have thought that he was not bequeathing statues under [the category of] marble.
§32.0.100.2'Uxori meae uestem, mundum muliebrem, ornamenta omnia, aurum argentum quod eius causa factum paratumque esset omne do lego'. Trebatius haec uerba 'quod eius causa factum paratumque est', ad aurum et argentum dumtaxat referri putat, Proculus ad omnia, quod et uerum est.
'To my wife I give and bequeath all clothing, women's toilet articles, ornaments, and gold and silver which has been made and prepared for her sake.' Trebatius thinks that these words 'which has been made and prepared for her sake' refer only to the gold and silver; Proculus refers them to everything, which is indeed correct.
§32.0.100.3Cui Corinthia uasa legata essent, ἐν Βάσεις quoque eorum uasorum collocandorum causa paratas deberi Trebatius respondit.
To whom Corinthian vessels had been bequeathed, Trebatius replied that the `en Baseis` [stands] also, which were prepared for the purpose of placing those vessels, were owed.
Labeo autem id non probat, si eas Βάσεις testator numero uasorum habuit.
But Labeo does not approve of this if the testator held those `Baseis` [stands] in the number of the vessels.
Proculus uero recte ait, si aeneae quidem sint, non autem Corinthiae, non deberi.
Proculus, however, rightly says that if they are indeed of bronze, but not Corinthian, they are not owed.
§32.0.100.4Cui testudinea legata essent, ei lectos testudineos pedibus inargentatos deberi Labeo Trebatius responderunt, quod uerum est.
To whom tortoise-shell articles had been bequeathed, Labeo and Trebatius replied that tortoise-shell couches with silvered feet were owed, which is correct.