[PROCULUS libro quinto epistularum. ] §31.0.46.prSi scripsisset qui legabat: 'quidquid mihi Lucium Titium dare facere oportet, Sempronio lego' nec adiecit 'praesens in diemue', non dubitarem, quantum ad uerborum significationem attineret, quin ea pecunia comprehensa non esset, cuius dies moriente eo, qui testamentum fecisset, nondum uenisset.
[PROCULUS in the fifth book of Epistles.] If the person making the legacy had written: 'Whatever Lucius Titius ought to give or do to me, I bequeath to Sempronius,' and did not add 'whether presently due or on a future day,' I would not doubt, so far as the meaning of the words is concerned, that that money was not included, the day of payment for which had not yet come at the time of the death of the person who made the will.
adiciendo autem haec uerba 'praesens in diemue' aperte mihi uidetur ostendisse eam quoque pecuniam legare uoluisse.
However, by adding these words 'whether presently due or on a future day,' he seems to me to have clearly shown that he wished to bequeath that money as well.