[POMPONIUS libro sexto ad Sabinum. ] §30.1.36.pr'Titiae textores meos omnes, praeterquam quos hoc testamento alii legaui, lego.
[POMPONIUS, Book 6 on Sabinus.] 'To Titia, I bequeath all my weavers, except those whom I have bequeathed to someone else in this will.
Plotiae uernas meos omnes, praeterquam quos alii legaui, lego'. Cum essent quidam et uernae idem et textores, Labeo ait, quoniam nec quos Titiae textores non legauerit, aliter apparere possit, quam si cognitum fuerit, quos eorum Plotiae legauerit, nec quos Plotiae uernas non legauerit, possit, neutrius legato exceptos esse eos de quibus quaeritur et ideo communes ambobus esse: hoc enim iuris est et si neutrius legati nomine quicquam esset exceptum.
To Plotia, I bequeath all my home-born slaves, except those whom I have bequeathed to someone else.' Since there were certain slaves who were both home-born and weavers, Labeo says that, because it cannot otherwise appear which weavers he did not bequeath to Titia unless it is known which of them he bequeathed to Plotia, nor can it appear which home-born slaves he did not bequeath to Plotia, those in question are excluded from the legacy of neither, and therefore are common to both; for this is the rule of law even if nothing had been excepted under the name of either legacy.
§30.1.36.1Quod si hoc modo esset legatum 'textores omnes praeter uernas' et rursus 'uernas omnes praeter textores', qui et uerna et textor esset, neutri fuisse legatum.
But if the legacy had been made in this manner: 'all weavers except home-born slaves', and again, 'all home-born slaves except weavers', anyone who was both home-born and a weaver would have been bequeathed to neither.
§30.1.36.2Nihil distat, utrum ita legetur 'Titio et Maeuio' an ita Titio cum Maeuio': utrubique enim coniunctim legatum uidetur.
It makes no difference whether the legacy is made 'to Titius and Maevius' or 'to Titius along with Maevius'; for in both cases the legacy is deemed to be made jointly.
§30.1.36.3Si alteri Stichum heres dederit, quem duobus dare damnatus fuerat, et antequam interpellaretur ab altero Stichus mortuus est, heres non tenetur, quia nihil per eum factum intellegitur.
If the heir has delivered Stichus, whom he had been condemned to give to two persons, to one of them, and before he was sued by the other, Stichus died, the heir is not liable, because it is understood that nothing was done by his fault.