[GAIUS libro tertio ad edictum prouinciale. ] §3.5.21.prSiue hereditaria negotia siue ea, quae alicuius essent, gerens aliquis necessario rem emerit, licet ea interierit, poterit quod impenderit iudicio negotiorum gestorum consequi: ueluti si frumentum aut uinum familiae parauerit idque casu quodam interierit, forte incendio ruina.
[GAIUS, On the Provincial Edict, book three] Whether managing hereditary business or that which belongs to someone, if someone has of necessity purchased a thing, even though it has perished, he will be able to recover what he expended by the action for business management: for instance, if he provided grain or wine for the slaves and it perished by some accident, such as by fire or collapse of a building.
sed ita scilicet hoc dici potest, si ipsa ruina uel incendium sine uitio eius acciderit: nam cum propter ipsam ruinam aut incendium damnandus sit, absurdum est eum istarum rerum nomine, quae ita consumptae sunt, quicquam consequi.
But this, of course, can only be said if the collapse or fire itself occurred without his fault: for since he would have to be condemned on account of the collapse or fire itself, it is absurd that he should recover anything on account of those things which were thus destroyed.