[ULPIANUS libro decimo ad edictum. ] §3.4.7.prSicut municipum nomine actionem praetor dedit, ita et aduersus eos iustissime edicendum putauit.
[ULPIAN, in the tenth book on the Edict.] Just as the praetor granted an action in the name of the townsmen, so also he thought it most just that an edict should be issued against them.
sed et legato, qui in negotium publicum sumptum fecit, puto dandam actionem in municipes.
But I also think that an action against the townsmen should be granted to an envoy who has made expenditures for public business.
§3.4.7.1Si quid uniuersitati debetur, singulis non debetur: nec quod debet uniuersitas singuli debent.
If anything is owed to a corporation, it is not owed to the individual members; nor do the individual members owe what the corporation owes.
§3.4.7.2In decurionibus uel aliis uniuersitatibus nihil refert, utrum omnes idem maneant an pars maneat uel omnes immutati sint.
In the case of decurions or other corporations, it makes no difference whether all members remain the same, or a part remains, or all have been changed.
sed si uniuersitas ad unum redit, magis admittitur posse eum conuenire et conueniri, cum ius omnium in unum recciderit et stet nomen uniuersitatis.
But if a corporation is reduced to a single person, it is rather accepted that he can sue and be sued, since the rights of all have fallen back upon one person and the name of the corporation remains.