[ULPIANUS libro nono ad edictum. ] §3.3.31.prSi quis, cum procuratorio nomine condemnatus esset, heres extiterit domino litis: iudicati actionem non recte recusabit.
[ULPIANUS, in the ninth book on the Edict.] If anyone, having been condemned in the name of a procurator, should become heir to the principal of the lawsuit, he will not rightly refuse the action on the judgment.
hoc si ex asse.
This is so if he is the heir to the whole estate.
sin autem ex parte heres extiterit et totum soluerit, si quidem ei mandatum est hoc quoque ut soluat, mandati actionem aduersus coheredes habebit: si non sit mandatum, negotiorum gestorum actio datur.
But if he should become heir in part and has paid the whole, then, if indeed it was mandated to him to pay this as well, he will have an action of mandate against his co-heirs; if it was not mandated, an action on conducting business is given.
quod est et si heres procurator non exstiterit et soluerit.
This is also the case if the procurator has not become heir and yet has paid.
§3.3.31.1Unius litis plurium personarum plures dari procuratores non est prohibitum.
It is not prohibited that for a single lawsuit of several persons, several procurators are appointed.
§3.3.31.2Iulianus ait eum, qui dedit diuersis temporibus procuratores duos, posteriorem dando priorem prohibuisse uideri.
Julian says that he who has appointed two procurators at different times is deemed, by appointing the later one, to have forbidden the former.