[ULPIANUS libro sexto ad edictum. ] §3.1.3.pr'Cui eorum a parente, aut de maioris partis 'tutorum sententia, aut ab eo cuius de ea re iurisdictio fuit ea tutela curatioue data erit. ' Adfinitates non eas accipere debemus, quae quondam fuerunt, sed praesentes.
'To whomsoever of them that guardianship or curatorship shall have been given by a parent, or according to the opinion of the majority of the tutors, or by him who had jurisdiction concerning that matter.' We ought to accept not those affinities which once existed, but present ones.
§3.1.3.1Item Pomponius nurus et generi appellatione et soceri et socrus et ulteriores, quibus pro praepositio solet accedere, contineri ait.
Likewise Pomponius says that by the designation of daughter-in-law and son-in-law, and of father-in-law and mother-in-law, those more remote, to whom the prefix 'pro' is accustomed to be added, are also included.
§3.1.3.2In curatoribus debuisse eum adicere: muti ceterorumque, quibus dare solent, id est surdo prodigo et adulescenti:
In the case of curators, [he says] he [the Praetor] ought to have added: [the case] of a mute person, and of the others to whom they are accustomed to be given, that is, a deaf person, a prodigal, and a youth.