[IDEM libro septimo ad Sabinum. ] §29.4.2.prLicet pro herede gerere non uideatur, qui pretio accepto praetermisit hereditatem, tamen dandam in eum actionem exemplo eius, qui omissa causa testamenti ab intestato possidet hereditatem, diuus Hadrianus rescripsit: proinde legatariis et fideicommissariis tenebitur.
[THE SAME, book seven on Sabinus] Although he who has abandoned the inheritance having accepted a price does not seem to act as heir, nevertheless the deified Hadrian wrote in a rescript that an action should be given against him after the example of one who, having abandoned the basis of the testament, possesses the inheritance as on intestacy; therefore, he will be held liable to the legatees and fideicommissaries.
§29.4.2.1Sed utrum ab eo erit incipiendum et sic ad heredem ueniendum an conuertemus ordinem? mihi uidetur humanior esse haec sententia, ut possessor hereditatis prior excutiatur, maxime si lucratiuam habet possessionem.
But should we begin with him and so come to the heir, or shall we reverse the order? To me, this opinion seems more humane, that the possessor of the inheritance should first be sued, especially if he has a lucrative possession.