[IDEM libro decimo responsorum. ] §29.2.87.prEum bonis patris se miscere conuenit, qui remoto familiae uinculo pro herede gerere uidetur.
[THE SAME, from the tenth book of Opinions.] It is agreed that he meddles with the property of his father who, after the bond of the family has been removed, is seen to act as heir.
et ideo filius, qui tamquam ex bonis matris, cuius hereditatem suscepit, agrum ad hereditatem patris pertinentem ut maternum ignorans possedit, abstinendi consilium, quod in bonis patris tenuit, amississe non uidetur.
And therefore a son, who possessed land belonging to the inheritance of his father as if it were from the property of his mother (whose inheritance he accepted), being ignorant and believing it to be his mother's, is not deemed to have lost the intention of abstaining which he maintained in respect to the property of his father.
§29.2.87.1Pupillis, quos placuit oneribus hereditariis esse liberandos, confusas actiones restitui oportet.
It is necessary that confused actions be restored to wards, whom it was decided should be freed from hereditary burdens.