Justinian I · The Digest of Justinian §28.5.49.pr-28.5.49.3
Form of Words and Validity in Heir Designation
Summary
This section examines the validity of instituting an heir, establishing that specifying an heir as 'owner of the inheritance' is valid, an unfilial son can be appointed with insults, a slave accused of adultery with his mistress cannot be validly designated by her, and minor errors in personal details do not invalidate the appointment if identity is clear.
Notes
- 28.5.49.2seruum adulterii accusatum non iure testamento manumissum ante sententiam ab ea muliere uideri... rationis est — The phrase 'rationis est' (it is reasonable) is an impersonal expression using the genitive of characteristic 'rationis', which takes the accusative with infinitive (AcI) clause as its subject. The main verb of this AcI clause is the infinitive 'uideri', and its subject accusative is 'seruum... manumissum' (referring to 'seruum... manumissum esse', that the slave was manumitted). Thus, the entire clause means 'it is reasonable that [the slave]... should not be seen [as lawfully manumitted].'
- 28.5.49.3dum de eo qui demonstratus sit constet — The conjunction 'dum' is used here to express a limitation or condition ('as long as', 'provided that') and governs the present subjunctive 'constet'. The impersonal verb 'constat' (it is clear/established) appears in the subjunctive, and the prepositional phrase 'de eo' (concerning the person) indicates the subject of clarification, with 'eo' being modified by the relative clause 'qui demonstratus sit' (who has been designated).
Cite this passage
Justinian I, The Digest of Justinian §28.5.49.pr-28.5.49.3. Humanitext Reader, https://reader.humanitext.ai/en/text/urn:cts:latinLit:phi2806.phi002.humanitext-lat1:28.5.49.pr-28.5.49.3
Please note the AI-draft status of the translation and the date accessed.
Translation, notes and summary are AI-generated drafts, revised through reader feedback.