[IDEM libro quinto opinionum. ] §27.9.9.prQuamuis antecessor praesidis decreuisset ea praedia uenumdari, quae tutor pupilli, subiecto nomine alterius emptoris, ipse sibi comparabat, tamen, si fraudem et dolum contra senatus consulti auctoritatem et fidem tutori commissam deprehendisset successor eius, aestimabit, quatenus tam callidum commentum etiam in exemplum coercere debeat.
[THE SAME, in the fifth book of Opinions.] Even though the predecessor of the governor had decreed that those estates should be sold, which the tutor of the ward, by substituting the name of another buyer, was acquiring for himself, nevertheless, if his successor should have detected fraud and deceit contrary to the authority of the senatusconsultum and the good faith entrusted to the tutor, he will determine to what extent he ought to punish such a clever device, even as a warning.